Marvin L. Finch v. Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated

00-1365Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit27 de set. de 2000

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1365
MARVIN L. FINCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-10-5-BR)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marvin L. Finch, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen W. Ewalt, MAUPIN,
TAYLOR & ELLIS, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Marvin L. Finch appeals the district court’s order granting
Smithfield’s motion for summary judgment on his employment
discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Finch v.
Smithfield Packing Company, Inc., No. CA-99-10-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb.
11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.