Shirley I. Medford v. Wachovia Corporation, formerly Central Fidel- ity Bank

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1001
SHIRLEY I. MEDFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WACHOVIA CORPORATION, formerly Central Fidel-
ity Bank,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-98-128-4)
Submitted: May 19, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley I. Medford, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis McKinley Hairston,
Jr., David C. Burton, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CLARK & DOBBINS, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Shirley I. Medford appeals the district court’s grant of
Wachovia Corporation’s motions for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for summary judgment, and
dismissing Medford’s employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting in
part the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Medford v. Wachovia Corp., No. CA-98-128-4
(E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --