26-4281•US v. David Turner
26-4281United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit28 de jul. de 2026
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 26-4281
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID TURNER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Adam B. Abelson, District Judge. (1:25-cr-00352-ABA-1)
Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 28, 2026
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Turner, Appellant Pro Se. David Christian Bornstein, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
David Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order entered in his criminal case
granting his motions for review of a detention order and for a de novo detention hearing
and denying his motions to vacate the court’s previous orders excluding time under the
Speedy Trial Act and regarding access to discovery, to strike standby counsel, and to stay
future competency evaluations. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291; see United States v. Sueiro, 946 F.3d 637, 639 (4th Cir. 2020), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949); see United States v.
Castellon, 92 F.4th 540, 543-44 (4th Cir. 2024). The order Turner seeks to appeal is neither
a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.