United States of America v. Roger Duronio

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 06-5116
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ROGER DURONIO, Appellant
(D.N.J. No. 02-cr-00933)
Before: MCKEE, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on February
9, 2009, be amended as follows:
On page 4, the sentence beginning “This was a direct response
to Duronio’s own suggestion . . .” should be changed to read as
follows: “This was a direct response to Duronio’s own
suggestion that the Government should have called the co-
worker as a prosecution witness.”
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By the Court,
/s/Theodore A. McKee
Circuit Judge
Dated: 12 February 2009

-- 1 of 2 --

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 06-5116
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ROGER DURONIO, Appellant
(D.N.J. No. 02-cr-00933)
Before: MCKEE, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on February
9, 2009, be amended as follows:
On page 4, the sentence beginning “This was a direct response
to Duronio’s own suggestion . . .” should be changed to read as
follows: “This was a direct response to Duronio’s own
suggestion that the Government should have called the co-
worker as a prosecution witness.”
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By the Court,
/s/Theodore A. McKee
Circuit Judge
Dated: 12 February 2009

-- 2 of 2 --