No: 06-1664 LUTICIA HAWTHORNE v. John E. Potter, Post Master General

061664np-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit2 de mai. de 2007

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

The Hon. Paul R. Michel, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for*
the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
1
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No: 06-1664
LUTICIA HAWTHORNE,
Appellant
v.
JOHN E. POTTER,
POST MASTER GENERAL
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(Civ. No. 03-cv-05465)
District Judge: Hon. Freda L. Wolfson
Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
April 19, 2007
Before: McKEE, AMBRO and MICHEL,*
Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: May 2, 2007)
OPINION
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
Luticia Hawthorne appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor
of the Postmaster General on her claims of race and disability discrimination. We will

-- 1 of 2 --

2
affirm.
Inasmuch as the District Court has set forth the factual and procedural history of
this case, we find it unnecessary to repeat that history here. See Hawthorne v. Potter,
2006 WL 231679 (D.N.J. Jan. 30, 2006). Moreover, in its Opinion the District Court has
carefully and completely explained why the Postmaster was entitled to summary
judgment on Hawthorne’s claims as a matter of law. We need not elaborate as we can
add little to the District Court’s thoughtful analysis and discussion. Accordingly, we will
affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.