Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Howard M. Kausner, dba Amor Arm Apart- ments

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
HOWARD M. KAUSNER, dba Amor Arm Apart-
ments, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2024-2011
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in No. 2:05-cv-00397-NM-
VBK, Judge Nora M. Manella.
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez brought suit against the
various appellees in California state court and then sought
to remove the case to federal court. The appellees moved
to dismiss. On May 23, 2005, the district court ordered that
the last such motion was submitted for consideration, and
on May 24, 2005, the district court granted the motions.
On June 17, 2024, Mr. Calderon Lopez filed a notice of ap-
peal directed to this court from a decision entered
“05/23/2005” in the district court action.
Case: 24-2011 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 07/24/2024

-- 1 of 2 --

CALDERON LOPEZ v. KAUSNER 2
“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case
is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S.
205, 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of ap-
peal must generally be filed within 60 days after entry of
final judgment when the case involves United States agen-
cies and officers, 28 U.S.C. § 2107; Fed. R. App. P. 4. Here,
Mr. Calderon Lopez’s notice of appeal, filed over 19 years
after the district court’s May 23, 2005 decision, is clearly
untimely. For at least this reason, we and any other court
of appeals lack jurisdiction.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
July 24, 2024
Date
F OR THE COURT
Case: 24-2011 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 07/24/2024

-- 2 of 2 --