Seah Steel Corp., Nexteel Co., Ltd., Aju Besteel Co., Ltd., Iljin Steel Corporation,… v. United States, Maverick Tube Corp., Tenaris Bay City, Inc., Ipsco Tubulars Inc.,…

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SEAH STEEL CORP., NEXTEEL CO., LTD., AJU
BESTEEL CO., LTD., ILJIN STEEL
CORPORATION, HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
HUSTEEL CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff
v.
UNITED STATES, MAVERICK TUBE CORP.,
TENARIS BAY CITY, INC., IPSCO TUBULARS INC.,
VALLOUREC STAR, L.P., WELDED TUBE USA
INC.,
Defendants
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant
______________________
2023-1109
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International
Trade in Nos. 1:19-cv-00086-JCG, 1:19-cv-00091-JCG,
1:19-cv-00092-JCG, 1:19-cv-00100-JCG, and 1:19-cv-
00101-JCG, Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves.
-------------------------------------------------
Case: 23-1109 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 05/04/2023

-- 1 of 3 --

SEAH STEEL CORP. v. US 2
SEAH STEEL CORP.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
HUSTEEL CO., LTD., NEXTEEL CO., LTD., AJU
BESTEEL CO., LTD., ILJIN STEEL
CORPORATION, HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY,
Plaintiffs
v.
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES STEEL
CORPORATION, VALLOUREC STAR, L.P.,
WELDED TUBE USA INC.,
Defendants-Appellees
MAVERICK TUBE CORP., TENARIS BAY CITY,
INC., IPSCO TUBULARS INC.,
Defendants
______________________
2023-1657
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International
Trade in Nos. 1:19-cv-00086-JCG, 1:19-cv-00091-JCG,
1:19-cv-00092-JCG, 1:19-cv-00100-JCG, and 1:19-cv-
00101-JCG, Judge Jennifer Choe-Groves.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
O R D E R
Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay City, Inc.,
and IPSCO Tubulars Inc. notify the court that they will not
participate further in these appeals. United States Steel
Corporation moves unopposed to voluntarily dismiss
Case: 23-1109 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 05/04/2023

-- 2 of 3 --

SEAH STEEL CORP. v. US 3
Appeal No. 2023-1109 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appel-
late Procedure 42(b) and the parties’ agreement as to the
allocation of costs.
Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2023-1109 is
dismissed.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs for Appeal No.
2023-1109.
(3) The revised official caption for Appeal No. 2023-
1657 is reflected in this order.
(4) The opening brief in Appeal No. 2023-1657 is due
no later than 60 days from the date of filing of this order.
May 4, 2023
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE (for 2023-1109 only):
May 4, 2023
Case: 23-1109 Document: 39 Page: 3 Filed: 05/04/2023

-- 3 of 3 --