Alexander Litz v. Tech Guru, LLC

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ALEXANDER LITZ,
Appellant
v.
TECH GURU, LLC,
Appellee
______________________
2021-2375
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in
No. 91214713.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Alexander Litz moves to voluntarily withdraw his ap-
peal “without the imposition of cost or attorney fees.” Mot.
at 1. Tech Guru, LLC responds and “does not object to [Mr.]
Litz’s withdrawal of his appeal, but it disagrees with [Mr.]
Litz’s request that such withdrawal occur without the im-
position of costs or attorney fees” because it “continues to
believe that [Mr.] Litz’s appeal is frivolous and that it has
Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 09/15/2022

-- 1 of 2 --

LITZ v. TECH GURU, LLC 2
been pursued for purposes of vexatiousness.” ECF No. 38
at 1.
Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The court has sua sponte determined that the award of
attorneys’ fees and costs is not appropriate. Mr. Litz’s mo-
tion is granted to the extent the appeal is dismissed with
each party to bear its own costs.
September 15, 2022
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 15, 2022
Case: 21-2375 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 09/15/2022

-- 2 of 2 --