Hamamatsu Photonics K.k. v. Semicaps Pte Ltd.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K.,
Appellant
v.
SEMICAPS PTE LTD.,
Appellee
______________________
2019-1890, 2019-1891
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-
02110, IPR2017-02112.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also
represented by RYAN
SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA;
DAVID EISEMAN, IV, San Francisco, CA; KOICHIRO
MINAMINO, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC.
CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang
LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also repre-
sented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA, RYAN J. MARTON.
______________________
Case: 19-1890 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2020

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O
RDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 15, 2020
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1890 Document: 57 Page: 2 Filed: 06/15/2020