United States Capitol Police v. Office of Compliance

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE,
Petitioner
v.
OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,
Respondent
UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE LABOR
COMMITTEE,
Intervenor
______________________
2017-2060, 2017-2062, 2017-2063, 2017-2064
______________________
Petitions for review of decisions of the Board of Direc-
tors of the Office of Compliance in Nos. 16-LM-03 (NG),
16-LM-04 (NG), 16-LM-05 (NG), 16-LM-06 (NG).
______________________
Decided: November 6, 2018
______________________
F REDERICK M. H ERRERA , Office of Employment Coun-
sel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued
for petitioner. Also represented by RAFIQUE O MAR
ANDERSON, K ELLY MARISSA SCINDIAN.
J OHN D. U ELMEN, Office of the General Counsel,

-- 1 of 2 --

US CAPITOL POLICE v. OOC 2
United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC,
argued for respondent. Also represented by J ULIA AKINS
CLARK.
MEGAN K ATHLEEN MECHAK, Woodley & McGillivary
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.
______________________
Before D YK, L INN, and T ARANTO, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
The petitions for review are dismissed for lack of ju-
risdiction in this court. See U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of
Compliance, Nos. 2017-2061, 2018-1504, slip op. at 8–12
(Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2018).
No costs.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --