Aat Bioquest, Inc. v. Texas Fluorescence Laboratories, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
AAT BIOQUEST, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant
______________________
2016-2056
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR,
Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.
______________________
Decided: February 15, 2017
______________________
K RISTA MARIE CARTER , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also
represented by D EBORAH E. F ISHMAN.
RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-
appellant.
______________________
Before P ROST , Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit
Judges.

-- 1 of 2 --

AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE 2
P ER CURIAM .
On this limited record and in light of the arguments
raised, the district court judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --