Capital Dynamics v. Cambridge Associates, LLC

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
CAPITAL DYNAMICS,
Appellant
v.
CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC,
Appellee
______________________
2016-1318
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014-
00079.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
EDMOND R. BANNON, Fish & Richardson, P.C., New
York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by
J ONATHAN A. MARSHALL .
D ALILA ARGAEZ WENDLANDT , Ropes & Gray LLP,
Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by J ON
STEVEN BAUGHMAN, J ORDAN R OSSEN, D ARRELL STARK,
Washington, DC.
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (MOORE, T ARANTO, and H UGHES , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
September 9, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --