Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. v. Hayward Industries, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.,
Appellant
v.
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1809
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,007.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MARK B OLAND, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington,
DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RAJA N.
SALIBA , G RANT SIMON SHACKELFORD.
MARK N IKOLSKY , McCarter & English, LLP, Newark,
NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by S COTT S.
CHRISTIE, STEVEN HALPERN, T IMOTHY P ATRICK HOMLISH ,
MATTHEW A DAM SKLAR, ELINA SLAVIN.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

-- 1 of 2 --

O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 14, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --