Osram Gmbh v. E. Fred Schubert

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
OSRAM GMBH,
Appellant
v.
E. FRED SCHUBERT,
Appellee
______________________
2015-1620
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR2013-
00459.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CHARLES SANDERS , Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston,
MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM
M. J AY , Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC.
D ANIEL L ADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York,
NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by J AMES M.
BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, T IMOTHY P. HEATON;
J USTIN BARNES , L ARA SUE G ARNER, San Diego, CA.

-- 1 of 2 --

T HOMAS W. K RAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for
intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT
WEIDENFELLER , L ORE A. U NT .
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, MAYER, and STOLL , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
April 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --