Keurig, Incorporated v. JBR, INC. (doing business as Rogers Family Company)

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
KEURIG, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JBR, INC. (doing business as Rogers Family
Company),
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1478
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-11941, Judge F.
Dennis Saylor, IV.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL A. ALBERT , Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of
Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
With him on the brief were G ERALD B. HRYCYSZYN and
CHELSEA A. L OUGHRAN.
T HOMAS M. P ETERSON , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP,
of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-
appellee. With him on the brief was D ANIEL J OHNSON, J R.

-- 1 of 2 --

______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, O’MALLEY , and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 12, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --