Optimum Power Solutions LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1277
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1278
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.

-- 1 of 3 --

O PTIMUM POWER S OLUTIONS V. H EWLETT-PACKARD
COMPANY
2
LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1279
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OPTIMUM POWER SOLUTIONS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DELL INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1280
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in Nos. 12-CV-3125, 12-
CV-3126, 12-CV-3127, and 12-CV-4999, Judge William H.
Alsup.
______________________
Before D YK, WALLACH , and T ARANTO, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM
O R D E R
The judgments of non-infringement in favor of the de-
fendant-appellees Hewlett-Packard Co., Sony Electronics,
Inc., Lenovo, Inc., and Dell, Inc. are affirmed. We base
our decision solely on our agreement with the district
court’s construction of the phrase “wherein the power
control means supply power to said memory integrated
circuit.” Under the parties’ stipulation, our agreement
with this aspect of the district court’s claim construction

-- 2 of 3 --

O PTIMUM POWER S OLUTIONS V. H EWLETT-PACKARD
COMPANY
3
is sufficient to support the non-infringement judgment.
We do not reach any other issues raised on appeal.
AFFIRMED
F OR THE COURT
December 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
cc: Bryan G. Harrison
Paul Alexander

-- 3 of 3 --