Griffin Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
AND
OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC
(doing business as Otterbox),
Intervenor.
______________________
2013-1230
______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-780.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
T ERRY L. CLARK, Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, of Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellant.
P ANYIN A. H UGHES , Attorney, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,

-- 1 of 2 --

of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the
brief were P AUL R. BARDOS , Acting General Counsel, and
SIDNEY A. ROSENWEIG, Acting Assistant General Counsel.
Of counsel was WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Attorney.
L OUIS S. MASTRIANI, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaum-
berg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.
With him on the brief were D ANIEL F. SMITH and EVAN H.
L ANGDON.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (O’MALLEY , WALLACH , and T ARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
December 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --