C. Douglass Thomas and Alan E. Thomas v. Jack D. Pippin

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
C. DOUGLASS THOMAS AND ALAN E. THOMAS,
Appellants,
v.
JACK D. PIPPIN,
Appellee.
______________________
2013-1142, -1143, -1144
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interfer-
ence No. 105,801, 105, 802, 105, 803.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
C. D OUGLASS T HOMAS , IpVenture, Inc., of Los Altos,
California, argued for appellants.
WILLIAM F. L EE , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellee.
With him on the brief were MARK C. F LEMING, D ONALD R.
STEINBERG and ERIC F LETCHER ; and WILLIAM G.
MCELWAIN and CAROLYN J ACOBS CHACHKIN, of Washing-
ton, DC. Of counsel were R. D ANNY H UNTINGTON and

-- 1 of 2 --

WILLIAM N. HIGHET , Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck,
P.C., of Washington, DC.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , P LAGER , and T ARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 15, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --