Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. v. Overstock.com, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OVERSTOCK.COM, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee,
AND
NEWEGG, INC., AND MAGNELL ASSOCIATE, INC.,
(doing business as Newegg.com),
Defendants-Appellees.
______________________
2012-1629
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 09-CV-0422, Judge
Leonard Davis.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MARK C. F LEMING, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-

-- 1 of 2 --

appellant. With him on the brief were L AUREN B.
F LETCHER , ANNA L UMELSKY and YIN ZHOU. Of counsel on
the brief were J AN M. CONLIN and EMMETT J. MCMAHON,
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, LLP, of New York, New
York.
EDWARD R. R EINES , Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, of
Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendants-
appellees. With him on the brief was T IMOTHY C.
SAULSBURY . Of counsel on the brief were K ENT E.
BALDAUF , J R., D ANIEL H. BREAN and BRYAN P. CLARK, The
Webb Law Firm, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for defend-
ants-appellees, Newegg, Inc., et al.; J OHN H. BARR, J R.,
J EFFREY L. O LDHAM and CHRISTOPHER A. SHIELD, Brace-
well & Giuliani, LLP, of Houston, Texas, for defendant-
appellee, Overstock.com, Inc.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, L INN, and P ROST , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
May 15, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --