Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. Pacific Diesel Brake Co. [rule 36 Judgment]

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
JACOBS VEHICLE EQUIPMENT CO.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-
Cross Appellant,
AND
DANAHER CORPORATION,
Counterclaim Defendant-
Cross Appellant,
V .
PACIFIC DIESEL BRAKE COMPANY
AND SHARLAMEN HOLDINGS, LTD.,
Defendants-Appellants,
AND
JENARA ENTERPRISES, LTD.,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-
Appellant.
____________________
2012-1193, -1194
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Connecticut in case No. 93-CV-1093, Judge
Robert N. Chatigny.

-- 1 of 2 --

______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
PATRICK J. COYNE, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for
plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-cross appellants. Of
counsel on the brief were CHRISTOPHER B. M EAD , London
and Mead, of Washington, DC, and MARK L. AUSTRIAN ,
Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC.
JOSEPH W. BERENATO , III, Berenato & White, LLC,
of Bethesda, Maryland, argued for defendants
appellants/counterclaimant appellant. With him on the
brief was DAVID S. TAYLOR. Of counsel was MATTHEW
STAVISH ,
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (RADER , Chief Judge, D YK , and REYNA,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 16, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --