Max Rack, Inc. v. Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MAX RACK, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOIST FITNESS SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
2010-1417
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio in No. 05-CV-0784, Judge
Michael H. Watson.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
JEFFREY S. STANDLEY, Standley Law Group, LLP, of
Dublin, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on
the brief were JAMES L. K WAK , F. M ICHAEL SPEED , JR. and
M ICHAEL R. STONEBROOK .
S USAN B. M EYER, Gordon & Rees, LLP, of San Diego,
California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on
the brief was JOHN L. H ALLER .
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED :
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and D YK ,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --