Opposition No. 91/176,609) HOLT’S COMPANY v. Virgin Enterprises Limited

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
* Revised: February 10, 2009
2008-1370
(Opposition No. 91/176,609)
HOLT’S COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
Appellee.
M. Kelly Tillery, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for
appellant.
*James W. Dabney, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, of New York,
New York, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Victoria J.B. Doyle and
Mitchell Epner, and John F. Duffy, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
* Attorney’s name corrected.

-- 1 of 2 --

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1370
(Opposition No. 91/176,609)
HOLT’S COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office
in CASE NO(S). 91/176,609.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER Circuit Judges )
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED February 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --