Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp. [errata]

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
E R R A T A
March 10, 2008
Appeal No. 2007-1168, Erico Intl v. Vutec Corp
Precedential Opinion
Decided: February 19, 2008
In the dissenting opinion at, page 5, line 20, in the paragraph beginning “As used by my
colleagues,” the second sentence of that paragraph should read:
“Raising a “substantial question” concerning validity is not the same as . . .”
That is, after “validity” delete the comma and the word “it.”

-- 1 of 1 --