USA v. Jimmy Lee Highsmith

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-10901
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 4:21-cr-00008-MW-MAF-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-10901
Before WILLIAM PRYOR , Chief Judge, and WILSON and L UCK , Cir-
cuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Jimmy Lee High-
smith in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of
the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s mo-
tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Highsmith’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-10901 Document: 46-1 Date Filed: 02/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --