USA v. Francisco Saldana

20-14490; 21-10634Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit22 de mar. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 20-14490
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO SALDANA,
a.k.a. Frank,
a.k.a. Frank Rivera,
a.k.a. Warren G,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 1:95-cr-00605-PAS-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 20-14490 Date Filed: 03/22/2022 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2 Opinion of the Court 20-14490
____________________
No. 21-10634
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO SALDANA,
a.k.a. Frank,
a.k.a. Frank Rivera,
a.k.a. Warren G,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 1:95-cr-00605-PAS-1
____________________
Before J ORDAN, L UCK , and LAGOA , Circuit Judges.
PER C URIAM :
USCA11 Case: 20-14490 Date Filed: 03/22/2022 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

20-14490 Opinion of the Court 3
Francisco Saldana appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to reduce his sentence under section 404 of the First
Step Act. He argues that the district court erred in concluding that
he was not eligible to receive a lower sentence under the First Step
Act. The government concedes “that the district court’s conclu-
sion that it had no authority to reduce Saldana’s sentence was er-
roneous.”
After a thorough review of the record, we agree with the
parties that the district court erred in concluding that Saldana was
ineligible for a reduced sentence under section 404 of the First Step
Act. We REVERSE the order denying Saldana’s motion to reduce
his sentence and REMAND for the district court to exercise its dis-
cretion and decide whether to reduce Saldana’s sentences for his
crack cocaine convictions.1
1 This appeal was originally scheduled for oral argument but was removed
from the oral argument calendar by unanimous agreement of the panel under
11th Cir. R. 34-3(f).
USCA11 Case: 20-14490 Date Filed: 03/22/2022 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.