USA v. Charles King, III

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 20-12465
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES KING, III,
a.k.a. Charles King,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00317-AKK-SGC-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 20-12465 Document: 45-1 Date Filed: 01/03/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 20-12465
Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and ANDERSON, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:
P. Russell Steen, appointed counsel for Charles King, III in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and King’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED. King’s request for new counsel is DENIED AS
MOOT.
USCA11 Case: 20-12465 Document: 45-1 Date Filed: 01/03/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --