USA v. Derrick Bailey

14-14129Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16 de mar. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14129
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00054-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERRICK BAILEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(March 16, 2015)
Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Cox, Jr., counsel for Derrick Bailey, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
Case: 14-14129 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Bailey’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-14129 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.