USA v. Erasmo Molina

13-10769Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit25 de set. de 2013

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10769
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket 5:12-cr-00070-AKK-TMP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERASMO MOLINA,
a.k.a. Erasom Molina,
a.k.a. Memo,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(September 25, 2013)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James L. O’Kelley, appointed counsel for Erasmo Molina in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
Case: 13-10769 Date Filed: 09/25/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Molina’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-10769 Date Filed: 09/25/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.