Scholz Aluminium GMBH v. Gearbulk, Inc., et al

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15501
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-01330-RAL-MAP
SCHOLZ ALUMINIUM GMBH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEARBULK, INC.,
ARROW TERMINALS, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 19, 2012)
Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this bailment action, after a bench trial the district court concluded that
Case: 11-15501 Date Filed: 09/19/2012 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

the contract between Scholz Aluminum GmbH and Arrow Terminals, Inc.,
concerning the proper procedure for releasing aluminum billets stored at Arrow’s
facility was ambiguous, took parol evidence, and entered final judgment for
appellees Gearbulk, Inc., and Arrow Terminals, Inc. After thorough review, we
can discern no error in the district court’s interpretation of the contract between
the parties or the district court’s findings of fact. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 11-15501 Date Filed: 09/19/2012 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --