USA vs Bernardo Buendia-Capella

10-15905Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit1 de set. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 1, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-15905
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00283-VMC-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BERNARDO BUENDIA-CAPELLA,
a.k.a. Salvador Mattar-Mattar,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 1, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Howard C. Anderson, appointed counsel for Bernardo Buendia-Capella in

-- 1 of 2 --

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Buendia-Capella’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Buendia-Capella’s motion for
appointment of substitute counsel on appeal, as construed from his responsive
filing, is DENIED AS MOOT.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.