James Victor Paulk, et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

10-13561Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit26 de set. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 26, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-13561
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 5:09-cv-00045-LGW-JEG, 5:10-cv-00013-LGW-JEG
5:09-cv-00045
JAMES VICTOR PAULK,
TAMMY PAULK,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
a corporation,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
__________________________________________________________
5:10-cv-00013
TAMMY PAULK,
JAMES VICTOR PAULK,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus

-- 1 of 2 --

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
a corporation,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(September 26, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of Pace v. CSX
Transp., Inc., 613 F.3d 1066 (11th Cir. 2010), which was issued after the plaintiffs
filed their notice of appeal. Any remedy for the plaintiffs must come from the
Surface Transportation Board.1
This case was removed from the oral argument calendar under the provisions of 11th Cir.1
R. 34-3(f).
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.