USA v. HO

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 2, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-13548
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00141-CG-M-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DIEP VU HO,
a.k.a. Dumbo,
a.k.a. Quoc T. Ho,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(May 2, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Diep Vu Ho in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

-- 1 of 2 --

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ho’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --