In Re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation Doris Powell-Perry, Curnie Sanders vs Branch Banking and Trust Company

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 28, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-12374
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK,
1:10-cv-20820-JLK
In Re: CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION
___________________________________________________
DORIS POWELL-PERRY,
Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated,
CURNIE SANDERS,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(April 28, 2011)

-- 1 of 2 --

Before PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception, No. 09-893, 2011 WL 1561956 (April 27, 2011).
The district court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration is VACATED, and
this case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme
Court’s opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.1
Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of*
Alabama, sitting by designation.
This is an unlimited remand.1
2

-- 2 of 2 --