USA v. Luis Quiles

10-11491Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit25 de mai. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 25, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-11491
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00396-SDM-AEP-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LUIS QUILES,
llllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 25, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

Kimberly Nolen Hopkins, appointed counsel for Luis Quiles in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of
arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Quiles’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.