Little, Cathy, Applicant v. ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, permissibly self-insured, administered by CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SCHOOLS INSURANCE GROUP, Defendants

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CATHY LITTLE, Applicant
vs.
ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, permissibly self-insured,
administered by CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
SCHOOLS INSURANCE GROUP, Defendants
Adjudication Number: ADJ8791088
Oakland District Office
OPINION AND ORDER
DENYING PETITION
FOR REMOVAL
Defendant has filed a petition for removal from the order vacating the July 17, 2025
Findings, Award, and Orders issued on August 21, 2025, by the workers’ compensation
administrative law judge (WCJ).
Defendant contends that the WCJ erred in vacating the prior findings in this matter because
further development of the record is not necessary.
We have not received 	an Answer from applicant. The WCJ filed a Report and
Recommendation on Petition for Removal (Report) recommending that we deny removal.
We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Removal and the contents of the
WCJ’s Report. Based on our review of the record and based upon the WCJ’s analysis of the merits
of petitioner’s arguments in the WCJ’s Report, we will deny removal.
Removal is an extraordinary remedy rarely exercised by the Appeals Board. (Cortez v.
Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 596, 599, fn. 5 [71 Cal.Comp.Cases 155];
Kleemann v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 274, 280, fn. 2 [70
Cal.Comp.Cases 133].) The Appeals Board will grant removal only if the petitioner shows that
substantial prejudice or irreparable harm will result if removal is not granted. (Cal. Code Regs.,
tit. 8, 10955(a); see also Cortez, supra; Kleemann, supra.) Also, the petitioner must demonstrate
that reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy if a final decision adverse to the petitioner

2
ultimately issues. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 10955(a).) Here, based upon the WCJ’s analysis of the
merits of petitioner’s arguments, we are not persuaded that substantial prejudice or irreparable
harm will result if removal is denied and/or that reconsideration will not be an adequate remedy if
the matter ultimately proceeds to a final decision adverse to petitioner.
Decisions 	of 	the 	Appeals 	Board 	“must 	be 	based 	on 	admitted 	evidence 	in 	the
record.” (Hamilton v. Lockheed Corporation (Hamilton) (2001) 66 Cal.Comp.Cases 473, 476
(Appeals Board en banc).) Furthermore, decisions of the Appeals Board must be supported by
substantial evidence. 	(Lab. Code, §§ 5903, 5952(d); Lamb v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd.
(1974) 11 Cal.3d 274 [39 Cal.Comp.Cases 310]; Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1970)
3 Cal.3d 312 [35 Cal.Comp.Cases 500]; LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1970)
1 Cal.3d 627 [35 Cal.Comp.Cases 16].) An adequate and complete record is necessary to
understand the basis for the WCJ’s decision. (Lab. Code, § 5313; see also Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8,
§ 10761.)
Here, once the parties proceed to trial, they will have an opportunity to create a record,
raise all relevant issues, and submit evidence. Specifically, as part of that process, the parties will
have an opportunity to raise the issue of whether further development of the record was
appropriate. The trial WCJ can then consider the evidence and the legal arguments raised by the
parties and determine how best to proceed.
We make no judgment at this time whether additional discovery is warranted since without
a formal record available to review, we have no ability to make this determination.
Accordingly, we deny removal.

3
For the foregoing reasons,
IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s Petition for Removal from order vacating the
July 17, 2025 Findings, Award, and Orders issued on August 21, 2025, by the WCJ is DENIED.
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD
/s/ KATHERINE A. ZALEWSKI, CHAIR
I CONCUR,
/s/ CRAIG L. SNELLINGS, COMMISSIONER
/s/ ANNE SCHMITZ, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
NOVEMBER 14, 2025
SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT
THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.
CATHY LITTLE
IVANCICH & COSTIS, LLP
COHEN ASSOCIATES
EDL/mc
I certify that I affixed the official seal of
the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board
to this original decision on this date.
KL