Covina-Valley Unified School District (PERB A001E)

PERB Order No. A001ECalperb3 de dez. de 1976

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

STATE 	OF 	CALIFORNIA
EDUCATIONAL 	EMPLOYMENT 	RELATIONS 	BOARD
American Federation of Teachers
Covina-Valley Local 1432, 	AFL-CIO
in appeal of
Administrative Decision
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
________________ .)
Case No. 	LA-R-294
EERB Order No. 	Ad-1
ORDER
The determination of 	the Los Angeles Regional Director that 	the showing
of 	interest submitted by the AFT Local 1432, 	in the above captioned matter,
is 	insufficient is 	sustained by the Board itself.
The Board finds 	that 	the employer in this matter properly raised 	the
issue when it challenged the showing of 	interest in its decision
dated May 6, 	1976. 	The decision of 	the employer was 	timely filed
pursuant to Emergency Regulation 30022, 	in effect at 	that 	time.
Educational Employment Relations Board
12/3/76
12/3/76
12/3/76
~
sT,,·1 	o; c,,ur-on:!IA
..:,.-:..;. .._-. •..z-=.::.:=::.. --·· --- 	~~ ~--=..=--~--.:.·-=--
,EDUC t\ TI ONA L EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD
S~ntc Office 	Duilding
''Jl So. 	Orozid,~ay, 	Rocm 2.ll¼O-B
i:.. An9c les, 	c~ l i forn i a 	90012
(213) 	6?.0-5111 	SEP 2 21976
SeptGrber 20, 	1976
Bill C-0dfrey
Representative
AIT. Local 1432
1055 Calle Carrillo
San Di.tllas, 	C..t;. 	91773
Re: 	Li\-R-294
l)::>_ar Hr. 	Godfrey:
t 	•
As ·you know·, 	the Covina-Valley Unified School District contests the 30%
sha.'7ing of support submitted by your organization ii.-i its intervei.1.tion.
I 	have completed a review of all the material submitted by AFT and I 	find
that there is a total of 156 names that could be considered acceptable out
of a necessax:y 173 to 183. 	·
TI1e range of 173 to 183 is due to the inclusion o,f adult school teachers,
some of whom have signed the petition. 	Adult school teachers of less t.tian
full-ti.me signed your petition, 	so it appears .that they are also included
in the AFT unit. 	Since your claimed tmit did not exclude any adult school.
teac'"lers. 	the UD,it size 1•:0uld be approx:irr.ately 609. 	A valid intervention
t•:ould require at least 182. 70 signatures. 	Tlri.s letter- serves as notifi-
cation that. your organization has failed to meet that requirernent.
Any party ffi:l.Y obtain a review of t.'-lis action by filing an appeal to the
Board itself, 	923 12th Street, 	Sacrarr:e..."'1to, 	CA 	95814, 	to the attention of
Charles Cole, 	E:x:ecutive Director. 	'The appeal shall be :in t·iriting, signed
by the party or its age..."'1t and shall contain facts and argurr..ents upon ,,fuich
the aμpeal is based. 	The appeal shall be acco;:npa:r.ied by proof of service
of the document on each party.
Very tntly yours.
/']______. 	✓~-
~v" d · 	f, 	•	12/3/76	~
- 	Frances A. 	Kreil:lng
Regional Director
FAK:an
CC: 	CUEA CTA/'NFA
Covina-Valley Unified School District
.
9L HV 	sr IJ 	g ~:JO
Reference A

2 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

American Federation of Teachers
Covina~Valley Local 1432, AFL-CIO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EDUCATIONAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BoaRD

ORDER

in appeal of Case No. LA-R-294

Administ * D *
Ministrative Decision EERB Order No. Ad=1

Ne ee ee Sine Se ee Ne

The determination of the Los Angeles Regional Director that the showing
of interest submitted by the AFT Local 1432, in the above captioned matter,

is insufficient is sustained by the Board itself.

The Board finds that the employer in this matter properly raised the
issue when it challenged the showing of interest in its decision
dated May 6, 1976. The decision of the employer was timely filed

pursuant to Emergency Regulation 30022, in effect at that time.

Y

4

sO
‘a

ee, Educational Employment Relations Board
eg he |... sw", STEPHEN BARBER age .
Pan oo , wyExecutive Assistant-to the Board te

‘ oe, , we e “tat ea e

chee RS

yas 12/3/76

بــ

~
sT,,·1 	o; c,,ur-on:!IA
..:,.-:..;. .._-. •..z-=.::.:=::.. --·· --- 	~~ ~--=..=--~--.:.·-=--
,EDUC t\ TI ONA L EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD
S~ntc Office 	Duilding
''Jl So. 	Orozid,~ay, 	Rocm 2.ll¼O-B
i:.. An9c les, 	c~ l i forn i a 	90012
(213) 	6?.0-5111 	SEP 2 21976
SeptGrber 20, 	1976
Bill C-0dfrey
Representative
AIT. Local 1432
1055 Calle Carrillo
San Di.tllas, 	C..t;. 	91773
Re: 	Li\-R-294
l)::>_ar Hr. 	Godfrey:
t 	•
As ·you know·, 	the Covina-Valley Unified School District contests the 30%
sha.'7ing of support submitted by your organization ii.-i its intervei.1.tion.
I 	have completed a review of all the material submitted by AFT and I 	find
that there is a total of 156 names that could be considered acceptable out
of a necessax:y 173 to 183. 	·
TI1e range of 173 to 183 is due to the inclusion o,f adult school teachers,
some of whom have signed the petition. 	Adult school teachers of less t.tian
full-ti.me signed your petition, 	so it appears .that they are also included
in the AFT unit. 	Since your claimed tmit did not exclude any adult school.
teac'"lers. 	the UD,it size 1•:0uld be approx:irr.ately 609. 	A valid intervention
t•:ould require at least 182. 70 signatures. 	Tlri.s letter- serves as notifi-
cation that. your organization has failed to meet that requirernent.
Any party ffi:l.Y obtain a review of t.'-lis action by filing an appeal to the
Board itself, 	923 12th Street, 	Sacrarr:e..."'1to, 	CA 	95814, 	to the attention of
Charles Cole, 	E:x:ecutive Director. 	'The appeal shall be :in t·iriting, signed
by the party or its age..."'1t and shall contain facts and argurr..ents upon ,,fuich
the aμpeal is based. 	The appeal shall be acco;:npa:r.ied by proof of service
of the document on each party.
Very tntly yours.
/']______. 	✓~-
~v" d · 	f, 	•	12/3/76	~
- 	Frances A. 	Kreil:lng
Regional Director
FAK:an
CC: 	CUEA CTA/'NFA
Covina-Valley Unified School District
.
9L HV 	sr IJ 	g ~:JO
Reference A

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.