PERB Decision No. 0929S•State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) (Union of American Physicians and Dentists) (PERB 0929S)
State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) (Union of American Physicians and Dentists) (PERB 0929S)
PERB Decision No. 0929SCalperb6 de mai. de 1992
Texto completo
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECISION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD UNION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS, Charging Party, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA (DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION), Respondent. ) ) ) ) Case No. SF-CE-96-.'S PERB Decision No. 929-S May 6, 1992 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appearances: Davis, Cowell & Bowe by Richard G. McCracken, Attorney, for Union of American Physicians and Dentists; Edmund K. Brehl, Labor Relations Counsel, for State of California (Department of Personnel Administration). Before Hesse, Chairperson; Camilli and Caffrey, Members. DECISION AND ORDER HESSE, Chairperson: This case is before the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB or Board) on exceptions filed by the State of California (Department of Personnel Administration) (State) and cross-exceptions filed by the Union of American Physicians and Dentists (UAPD) to a proposed decision of a PERB administrative law judge which held that the State violated section 3519(c) of the Ralph C. Dills Act (Dills Act)1 by failing and refusing to bargain in good faith with UAPD. Subsequent to these filings, the State and UAPD requested that the exceptions and cross-exceptions be withdrawn. The Board has considered the requests of withdrawal and concurs that The Ralph C. Dills Act is codified at Government Code section 3512, et seq. _______ )
withdrawal is in the best interest of the parties and is consistent with the purposes of the Dills Act. It is hereby ORDERED that the exceptions and cross- exceptions filed to the proposed decision in Case No. SF-CE-96-S are WITHDRAWN WITH PREJUDICE. Members Camilli and Caffrey joined in this Decision. 2 2
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.