Talley v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

CourtListener 2950974Arkctapp16 de set. de 2015

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 472

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CV-15-342

LYNN TALLEY OPINION DELIVERED SEPTEMBER 16, 2015
APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE POPE COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT
V. [NO. JV-2013-227]

HONORABLE KEN D. COKER, JR.,
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUDGE
HUMAN SERVICES and MINOR
CHILDREN AFFIRMED; MOTION TO
APPELLEE WITHDRAW GRANTED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge

This appeal is from the January 16, 2015 Pope County Circuit Court order terminating

appellant Lynn Talley’s parental rights to her daughters, P.W. and A.W. Appellant’s counsel

has filed a no-merit brief pursuant to Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services,

359 Ark. 131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), and Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals

Rule 6-9(i) (2014), addressing all rulings decided adversely to appellant—including the

decision to terminate—and asserting that there are no issues that would support a meritorious

appeal. Counsel has also filed a motion asking to be relieved as counsel.

On May 27, 2015, the clerk of this court sent a copy of counsel’s motion and brief to

Ms. Talley informing her that she had the right to file pro se points for reversal. See Ark. Sup.

Ct. R. 6-9(i)(3). The packet was sent by certified mail to Ms. Talley’s last known address,

which was listed in the certificate of service on the motion to withdraw. On June 8, 2015,
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 472

the certified packet was returned to the clerk’s office marked “unclaimed.” Appellant’s counsel

has no additional contact information. Ms. Talley did not file pro se points for reversal, and

neither the Department of Human Services nor the attorney ad litem have filed briefs in this

appeal.

Having carefully examined the record and the no-merit brief, we conclude that counsel

has complied with the requirements established by the Arkansas Supreme Court for no-merit

appeals in termination cases and that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, we

affirm by memorandum opinion the termination of Ms. Talley’s parental rights. See In re

Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e)

(2014). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

WHITEAKER and HOOFMAN, JJ., agree.

Suzanne Ritter Lumpkin, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.