BVerwG 7 B 30/13, 7 B 30/13 (7 C 9/14)•Revision admitted on commercial waste collection by partnerships
BVerwG 7 B 30/13, 7 B 30/13 (7 C 9/14)Bverwg / Division 716 de abr. de 2014Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal on points of law in a dispute concerning commercial waste collection. It considered the case to raise questions of fundamental importance, namely whether partnerships can qualify as waste collectors under Section 3(10) KrWG and when a commercial collection is terminated. The court also determined the value in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings under the GKG provisions cited in the order.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal on points of law for fundamental importance in disputes under § 3 Abs. 10 KrWG. A revision is admissible where the case raises abstractly significant questions requiring clarification in the interests of the uniform development of the law, here as to whether partnerships may act as collectors of waste and under what conditions a commercial collection ends. The order on the value in dispute is governed by §§ 47, 52 and 63 GKG according to the respective procedural stage.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-04-16
Aktenzeichen: 7 B 30/13, 7 B 30/13 (7 C 9/14)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO, § 3 Abs 10 KrWG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 26. September 2013, Az: 20 BV 13.428, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 7. Senat
Revisionszulassung; gewerbliche Sammlung von Abfällen
1 Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) zuzulassen. In einem Revisionsverfahren können die Fragen geklärt werden, ob Personengesellschaften als Sammler von Abfällen im Sinne von § 3 Abs. 10 KrWG tätig sein können und unter welchen Voraussetzungen eine gewerbliche Sammlung beendet ist.
2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren aus § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether leave to appeal on points of law should be granted for a case of fundamental importance.
Leave to appeal on points of law was granted because the case raised questions of fundamental importance.
The court held that a revision could clarify whether partnerships may act as collectors of waste under Section 3(10) KrWG and under what conditions a commercial collection ends.
How the dispute costs and value in dispute should be set for the complaint and revision proceedings.
The court fixed the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings and for the revision proceedings under the cited provisions of the GKG.
The court referred to Sections 47 and 52 GKG, and for the revision also Section 63 GKG, as the basis for the valuation.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.