projetos

Revision admitted for damages claim over non-promotion

BVerwG 2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14)Bverwg / Divisão 24 de mar. de 2014Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The claimant's complaint against the non-admission of revision succeeded. The Federal Administrative Court held that the case has fundamental importance because it may clarify how, in a damages claim for unlawful failure to promote, possibly unlawful staffing-note requirements in the federal budget are to be considered when determining the hypothetical causal course. The court also addressed the value of the subject matter for costs purposes.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance in a damages action based on unlawful failure to promote; the need for clarification exists where the appeal raises whether, in reconstructing the hypothetical causal course, potentially unlawful staffing-note requirements linked to minimum periods of service must be taken into account when bundled posts are allocated. The question is suitable for review by the Federal Administrative Court when its resolution may affect the method of causal assessment in comparable promotion-damages disputes (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-03-04

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 15/13, 2 B 15/13 (2 C 12/14)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Hamburgisches Oberverwaltungsgericht, 16. November 2012, Az: 1 Bf 304/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Gründe

1 Die zulässige Beschwerde der Klägerin ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Bundesverwaltungsgericht Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und ggf. wie bei einer Klage auf Schadensersatz wegen rechtswidrig unterlassener Beförderung im Rahmen der Ermittlung des hypothetischen Kausalverlaufs die - möglicherweise rechtswidrigen, weil an bestimmte Verweilzeiten anknüpfenden - Vorgaben eines Stellenvermerks des Haushaltsplans bei der Ausbringung gebündelter Stellen zu berücksichtigen sind.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 71 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG i.V.m. § 40, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 5 Satz 2 i.V.m. Satz 1 Nr. 1 GKG a.F. (Beschluss vom 26. September 2002 - BVerwG 2 B 23.02 - Buchholz 360 § 13 GKG Nr. 114 S. 10); die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung des Streitwerts für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissionfundamental importancedamagesnon-promotionhypothetical causal coursestaffing notes

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance in a damages action over unlawful non-promotion.

Decisão extraída

Revision was to be admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance requiring clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Fundamentação extraída

The court held that the case could clarify whether, in determining the hypothetical causal course in a damages claim for unlawfully omitted promotion, possibly unlawful staffing-note requirements tied to minimum retention periods must be taken into account when bundled posts are created.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.