projetos

Revision allowed for preservation by heritage conservation bylaw

BVerwG 4 BN 20/13, 4 BN 20/13 (4 CN 7/13)Bverwg / Divisão 418 de dez. de 2013Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint against denial of leave to appeal and admitted the revision. The case concerns whether § 172(1)(1) BauGB can serve as a legal basis for a preservation bylaw intended to maintain existing block-edge development because of its noise-buffering effect. The court found that this question merits further clarification in revision. It also provisionally fixed the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings under the GKG provisions cited.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admissibility of revision for clarification of whether § 172 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 1 BauGB may justify an urban preservation bylaw aimed at retaining existing block-edge development solely because of its noise-screening function; fundamental significance is present where the contested legal question has not yet been clarified and the revision can contribute to its development (consid. 1). The provisional amount in dispute is determined under §§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 52 Abs. 1 and 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Texto completo

BVerwG — 4 BN 20/13, 4 BN 20/13 (4 CN 7/13), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-12-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 20/13, 4 BN 20/13 (4 CN 7/13)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 172 Abs 1 S 1 Nr 1 BauGB, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt, 29. November 2012, Az: 2 K 41/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Blockrandbebauung durch Erhaltungssatzung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Rechtsfrage beitragen, ob § 172 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 1 BauGB auch dann eine tragfähige Rechtsgrundlage für den Erlass einer Erhaltungssatzung ist, wenn die Gemeinde mit der Satzung den Zweck verfolgt, eine vorhandene Bebauung allein wegen ihrer Lärm abschirmenden Funktion für andere bauliche Anlagen ("Blockrandbebauung") zu erhalten.

2 Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental significanceurban preservation bylawblock-edge developmentnoise shieldingamount in dispute

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted because § 172(1)(1) BauGB can support a preservation bylaw aimed at retaining block-edge development for its noise-screening function.

Decisão extraída

The legal question is open and warrants clarification in revision; the complaint is well-founded and revision is admitted.

Fundamentação extraída

The revision may contribute to further clarification of whether § 172(1)(1) BauGB also provides a valid legal basis when the municipality seeks to preserve existing development solely because of its noise-shielding function for other structures.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.