projetos

Revision admitted on EU age-discrimination issues in civil service pay

BVerwG 2 B 98/13, 2 B 98/13 (2 C 47/13)Bverwg / Divisão 226 de nov. de 2013Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision in a civil service remuneration dispute. It considered the case capable of clarifying whether former §§ 27 and 28 BBesG violate the EU prohibition of age discrimination, whether claims to higher pay must be raised within the current budget year, and whether Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/78/EC also applies to national pay rules.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of the revision for fundamental importance. A revision is to be admitted where the appeal proceedings raise unresolved questions of law capable of clarification in the interests of legal unity or legal development. Fundamental importance exists in particular where the dispute concerns the compatibility of national remuneration provisions with Union-law discrimination prohibitions, the temporal assertion of salary claims, and the scope of an EU-law sectoral exception; it is sufficient that the court of revision may clarify these questions in the concrete case.

Texto completo

BVerwG — 2 B 98/13, 2 B 98/13 (2 C 47/13), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-11-26

Aktenzeichen: 2 B 98/13, 2 B 98/13 (2 C 47/13)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 27 BBesG vom 06.08.2002, § 28 BBesG vom 06.08.2002, Art 1 EGRL 78/2000, Art 2 Abs 1 EGRL 78/2000, Art 2 Abs 2 EGRL 78/2000, Art 3 Abs 4 EGRL 78/2000, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz, 19. Juli 2013, Az: 10 A 10422/13, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Titelzeile

Beamtenbesoldung; Altersdiskriminierungsverbot des Unionsrechts; Revisionszulassung

Gründe

1 Das Revisionsverfahren erscheint geeignet zur Klärung beizutragen, ob die Vorschriften der §§ 27 und 28 BBesG a.F. gegen das Verbot der Altersdiskriminierung aus Art. 1 i.V.m. Art. 2 Abs. 1 und 2 der RL 2000/78/EG verstoßen, ob der Anspruch auf eine über das Gesetz (§§ 27 und 28 BBesG a.F.) hinausgehende Besoldung innerhalb des laufenden Haushaltsjahres geltend zu machen ist und ob sich die Bereichsausnahme des Art. 3 Abs. 4 der RL 2000/78/EG auch auf besoldungsrechtliche Regelungen der Mitgliedstaaten erstreckt.

Palavras-chave

civil service payage discriminationEuropean Union lawrevision admissibilityfundamental importance

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the revision should be admitted because the case raises questions of fundamental importance regarding §§ 27 and 28 BBesG a.F. and Directive 2000/78/EC.

Decisão extraída

The court found the revision suitable for clarification of several unresolved legal questions and therefore admitted it.

Fundamentação extraída

The case could clarify whether the former salary rules violate the Union prohibition of age discrimination, whether claims to pay above the statutory scheme must be asserted within the current budget year, and whether Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/78/EC also covers member-state pay rules.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.