projetos

Revision admitted in BAföG reimbursement dispute

BVerwG 5 B 82/12, 5 B 82/12 (5 C 8/13)Bverwg / Divisão 55 de fev. de 2013Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court granted the plaintiff’s complaint and admitted the revision. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance, namely whether a reimbursement dispute between a social welfare authority and an educational assistance office requires an application within the meaning of § 46 BAföG. The court did not decide that substantive question at this stage; it only found that clarification in revision proceedings was warranted.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance in a reimbursement dispute concerning § 46 BAföG. A revision is to be admitted if the case gives rise to a legally significant, unresolved question of general importance that is capable of clarification in the revision proceedings. This is so where it must be determined whether, in a reimbursement dispute between a social welfare authority and an educational assistance office, an application requirement exists under § 46 BAföG. The admissibility threshold is met even though the substantive question itself remains open at the stage of leave to appeal (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 5 B 82/12, 5 B 82/12 (5 C 8/13), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-02-05

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 82/12, 5 B 82/12 (5 C 8/13)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 46 BAföG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 3. September 2012, Az: 12 A 1082/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Erstattungsstreit; Antrag auf Bewilligung von Leistungen der Ausbildungsförderung

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde des Klägers ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.

2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, die grundsätzliche Frage zu klären, ob in einem Erstattungsstreit eines Sozialhilfeträgers gegenüber einem Amt für Ausbildungsförderung ein Antragserfordernis im Sinne von § 46 BAföG besteht.

Palavras-chave

revision admissionfundamental importancereimbursement disputeBAföGapplication requirement

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether the revision should be admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance under § 132(2)(1) VwGO.

Decisão extraída

Yes. The complaint is admissible and well-founded; the revision is admitted because the case presents a question of fundamental importance.

Fundamentação extraída

The Senate considered that the revision could clarify whether, in a reimbursement dispute between a social welfare authority and an educational assistance office, a prior application is required within the meaning of § 46 BAföG.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.