Scope of cost reimbursement under § 89a(3) SGB VIII

BVerwG 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11)Bverwg / Divisão 522 de dez. de 2011Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision against a judgment of the Administrative Courtshof Baden-Württemberg in a dispute over reimbursement of costs between public youth welfare authorities. It held that the matter is of fundamental importance because the revision may clarify the scope of § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance: Revision is to be admitted where the case is capable of clarifying the scope and application of a provision of federal law of recurring significance. In a dispute over inter-authority cost reimbursement under § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII, the need for clarification of the statutory reimbursement regime may satisfy the requirement of grundsätzliche Bedeutung (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-12-22

Aktenzeichen: 5 B 36/11, 5 B 36/11 (5 C 25/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 89a Abs 3 SGB 8

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg, 16. Februar 2011, Az: 12 S 1608/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 5. Senat

Titelzeile

Kostenerstattung zwischen öffentlichen Jugendhilfeträgern

Gründe

1 Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichtshofs Baden-Württemberg vom 16. Februar 2011 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit geben, den Anwendungsbereich der Kostenerstattungsregelung des § 89a Abs. 3 SGB VIII zu klären.

Palavras-chave

cost reimbursementyouth welfarerevision admissibilityfundamental importancestatutory interpretation

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted for the case concerning cost reimbursement between public youth welfare authorities under § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Decisão extraída

Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance and may clarify the scope of § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Fundamentação extraída

The Court considered that the revision could give the Senate an opportunity to clarify the application of the cost-reimbursement rule in § 89a(3) SGB VIII.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.