projetos

Leave to appeal on planning justification of retail-centre protections

BVerwG 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)Bverwg / Divisão 429 de nov. de 2011Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court allowed the complaint against the refusal to admit revision. It held that the case is of fundamental importance because the revision proceedings may clarify the requirements for the planning-law justification of land-use plan provisions intended to strengthen central supply areas. The court also set the dispute value for the complaint proceedings and the provisional dispute value for the revision proceedings under the cited fee statutes.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; requirements for leave to appeal on questions concerning the planning-law justification of land-use plan provisions to strengthen central supply areas; revision is to be admitted where the case can clarify abstract standards for the städtebauliche Rechtfertigung of such designations. The existence of a need for clarification on the prerequisites of the planning measure suffices to establish fundamental importance (consid. 1).

Texto completo

BVerwG — 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-29

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 23/11, 4 BN 23/11 (4 CN 6/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 12. April 2011, Az: 10 D 42/09.NE, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

leave to appealfundamental importanceplanning lawcentral supply areasdispute valuerevision

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be allowed under Section 132(2)(1) VwGO because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.

Decisão extraída

Revision was admitted because the appeal could clarify what requirements apply to the planning-law justification of land-use plan provisions aimed at strengthening central supply areas.

Fundamentação extraída

The court found a need for clarification on the abstract legal requirements for such planning designations, which justified leave to appeal for reasons of fundamental importance.

Questão jurídica principal

How the costs and provisional value of the proceedings are to be set.

Decisão extraída

The costs assessment was based on the GKG provisions cited by the court, and the provisional value for the revision proceedings was set accordingly.

Fundamentação extraída

The court referred to the applicable provisions on court fees and value assessment without further elaboration.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.