projetos

Revision allowed on urban planning justification requirements

BVerwG 4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11)Bverwg / Divisão 429 de nov. de 2011Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the complaint and admitted the revision. It considered the case suitable for clarifying what requirements apply to the urban-planning justification of land-use plan provisions intended to strengthen central supply areas. The decision also set the dispute value for the complaint proceedings and provisionally for the revision proceedings.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision admissibility for fundamental questions of law in planning cases: Revision is to be allowed where the dispute raises an unresolved abstract legal question whose clarification may contribute to the development or uniform application of the law. In matters concerning urban land-use planning provisions aimed at strengthening central supply areas, the decisive issue is whether the challenged measures are sufficiently justified by planning considerations; the need for clarification of those requirements establishes fundamental importance. Value-in-dispute determinations follow §§ 47, 52, 63 GKG.

Texto completo

BVerwG — 4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-29

Aktenzeichen: 4 BN 24/11, 4 BN 24/11 (4 CN 7/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 12. April 2011, Az: 10 D 112/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Titelzeile

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung zentraler Versorgungsbereiche

Gründe

1 Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen, weil das Revisionsverfahren zur Klärung der Frage beitragen kann, welche Anforderungen an die städtebauliche Rechtfertigung bauleitplanerischer Festsetzungen zur Stärkung von zentralen Versorgungsbereichen zu stellen sind.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

revision admissibilityfundamental importanceurban planningcentral supply areasdispute value

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be allowed under Section 132(2) No. 1 VwGO because the case raises a question of principle on the planning-law justification of zoning rules to strengthen central supply areas.

Decisão extraída

Yes. The complaint was well-founded and revision was admitted because the proceedings could clarify the requirements for the urban-planning justification of such land-use planning provisions.

Fundamentação extraída

The court found a need for clarification on the abstract legal requirements governing planning measures aimed at strengthening central supply areas, which satisfies the ground of fundamental importance.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.