projetos

Revision allowed on use of remaining licence term

BVerwG 6 B 32/11, 6 B 32/11 (6 C 39/11)Bverwg / Divisão 624 de nov. de 2011Granted

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the revision against a Bavarian Administrative Court judgment in a broadcasting-licence dispute. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental significance: whether, and under what circumstances, a broadcaster may invoke proportionality and the fundamental rights to broadcasting freedom and occupational freedom to continue using the remaining term of a licence after changes of 50% or more in the ownership and participation structure of the provider company. The court also fixed the value of the appeal and provisional revision proceedings.

Sumário Omnilex

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; revision is admissible where a case presents a question of fundamental significance not yet sufficiently clarified in the court's case law. A question is fundamental where its answer is capable of contributing to the development or uniform application of law, here concerning whether major changes in the ownership and participation structure of a broadcasting company may, in light of proportionality and Art. 5(1) sentence 2 GG and Art. 12(1) GG, justify a right to exploit the remaining term of a broadcasting licence. The abstract legal question must be decisive for the dispute and go beyond the individual case.

Texto completo

BVerwG — 6 B 32/11, 6 B 32/11 (6 C 39/11), Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-11-24

Aktenzeichen: 6 B 32/11, 6 B 32/11 (6 C 39/11)

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: Art 5 Abs 1 S 2 GG, Art 12 Abs 1 GG, § 132 Abs 2 Nr 1 VwGO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, 13. April 2011, Az: 7 BV 10.1855, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Titelzeile

Anspruch auf Ausnutzung der Restlaufzeit einer Sendegenehmigung

Gründe

1 Die Revision ist gem. § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur Beantwortung der bisher in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts nicht ausreichend geklärten Frage beitragen, ob und unter welchen Umständen bei Änderungen von 50 v.H. und mehr der Inhaber- und Beteiligungsverhältnisse der Anbietergesellschaft eines Rundfunkprogramms aus Gründen des verfassungsrechtlichen Grundsatzes der Verhältnismäßigkeit und der Grundrechte aus Art. 5 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Alt. 2 GG und Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG ein Anspruch auf Ausnutzung der Restlaufzeit einer Sendegenehmigung erwachsen kann.

2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.

Palavras-chave

broadcasting licencefundamental significancerevision admissibilityownership changeproportionalityfreedom of broadcastingfreedom of occupationcourt value

Extraído pela Omnilex

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Questão jurídica principal

Whether revision should be admitted for the question of a claim to use the remaining term of a broadcasting licence after changes of 50% or more in ownership and participation structures.

Decisão extraída

The revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental significance that is not yet sufficiently clarified in the court's case law.

Fundamentação extraída

The unresolved question concerns whether, in light of proportionality and the fundamental rights under Art. 5(1) sentence 2 GG and Art. 12(1) GG, a right to use the remaining licence term can arise after such ownership changes.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.