BVerwG 5 B 47/10, 5 B 47/10 (5 C 9/11)•New application or reopening in expellee admission proceedings
BVerwG 5 B 47/10, 5 B 47/10 (5 C 9/11)Bverwg / Divisão 524 de mai. de 2011Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court upheld the plaintiff's complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal. It held that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: whether, after a final rejection in expellee admission proceedings, a fresh application is admissible or whether only reopening under § 51 VwVfG is possible. For that reason, revision was allowed.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; leave to appeal for fundamental importance in expellee admission proceedings: A complaint against the refusal of leave to appeal is well founded if the case raises a clarification-relevant question of general significance. Such significance exists where it is doubtful whether, after final rejection of an expellee admission application, a new application is admissible or whether the claimant is limited to reopening under § 51 VwVfG; the revision is then to be allowed for clarification of this abstract legal question.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-05-24
Aktenzeichen: 5 B 47/10, 5 B 47/10 (5 C 9/11)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 51 VwVfG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, 8. Juni 2010, Az: 12 A 3328/08
Spruchkörper: 5. Senat
Neuantrag oder Wiederaufgreifen eines vertriebenenrechtlichen Aufnahmeverfahrens
1 Die Beschwerde der Klägerin ist zulässig und begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen.
2 Die Revision kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, ob und gegebenenfalls unter welchen Voraussetzungen im vertriebenenrechtlichen Aufnahmeverfahren nach bestandskräftiger Ablehnung ein neuer Antrag statthaft oder ob nur ein Wiederaufgreifen nach § 51 VwVfG möglich ist.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether revision should be allowed because the case has fundamental legal significance.
Revision is admitted.
The complaint is admissible and well-founded; the case raises a fundamental question requiring clarification at the revision stage.
Whether, after final rejection in an expellee admission procedure, a new application is possible or only reopening under § 51 VwVfG.
The revision may clarify whether a new application is admissible and, if so, under what conditions, or whether only reopening under § 51 VwVfG is available.
The question is legally unresolved and of general importance in expellee admission proceedings.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.