BVerwG 7 C 13/09•Settlement in subsidy dispute to party-affiliated foundation
BVerwG 7 C 13/09Bverwg / Division 75 de jul. de 2010Settled
Extraído pela Omnilex
In an administrative dispute concerning a subsidy for a party-affiliated foundation, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht proposed a settlement under Section 106 sentence 2 VwGO. The defendant agreed on 28 June 2010 and the plaintiff on 29 June 2010. The court held that the proceedings were thereby terminated by judicial settlement and ordered the case to be discontinued. It further declared the judgments of the Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgericht and the Verwaltungsgericht Gera without effect.
§ 106 S. 2 VwGO; acceptance of a court-proposed settlement by both parties terminates the proceedings by judicial settlement. Upon effective settlement, the proceedings are to be discontinued; prior judgments rendered in the dispute lose their effect and are to be declared ineffective. The settlement may be concluded by written declarations of consent. Cost determination remains subject to the applicable provisions on court fees and value assessment (cf. consid. 1 f.).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-07-05
Aktenzeichen: 7 C 13/09
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 106 S 2 VwGO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgericht, 26. November 2008, Az: 3 KO 363/08, Urteilvorgehend VG Gera, 17. Juli 2006, Az: XX, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 7. Senat
Zuschuss an parteinahe Stiftung
1 Mit Beschluss vom 16. Juni 2010 hat das Bundesverwaltungsgericht gemäß § 106 Satz 2 VwGO den Parteien den Abschluss eines Vergleichs vorgeschlagen. Der Beklagte hat dem Vergleichsvorschlag mit Schriftsatz vom 28. Juni 2010 zugestimmt. Der Kläger hat mit Schriftsatz vom 29. Juni 2010 dem vorgeschlagenen Vergleich ebenfalls zugestimmt. Damit ist das Verfahren durch Abschluss eines gerichtlichen Vergleichs beendet worden (vgl. § 106 Satz 2 VwGO). Es ist deshalb einzustellen. Die Urteile des Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgerichts vom 26. November 2008 und des Verwaltungsgerichts Gera vom 17. Juli 2006 sind für wirkungslos zu erklären.
2 Die Streitwertfestsetzung beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 3 GKG.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the proceedings should be terminated after the parties accepted the court's settlement proposal.
Yes. The parties accepted the settlement proposal, so the case ended by judicial settlement and had to be discontinued.
Under Section 106 sentence 2 VwGO, the court's settlement proposal became effective once both sides agreed by written submissions.
What should happen to the prior judgments of the lower courts after the settlement.
The judgments of the Thüringer Oberverwaltungsgericht and the Verwaltungsgericht Gera were declared without effect.
Because the proceedings ended through a judicial settlement, the prior judgments could no longer remain operative and had to be declared ineffective.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.