BVerwG 5 B 29/09, 5 B 29/09 (5 C 3/10)•Revision admissible on compensation for hereditary building right
BVerwG 5 B 29/09, 5 B 29/09 (5 C 3/10)Bverwg / Divisão 526 de jan. de 2010Granted
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Federal Administrative Court admitted revision against the judgment of the Administrative Court of Leipzig. The court found that the case raises a question of fundamental importance: the basis for calculating compensation for a hereditary building right on a rubble property and the interpretation of § 3(1) sentence 1 nos. 4 and 5 EntschG.
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; admission of revision for fundamental importance. A revision is to be allowed where the case raises a question of fundamental significance. This is the case where clarification is needed for the assessment basis of compensation for a hereditary building right on a so-called rubble property and where the interpretation of § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 4 and Nr. 5 EntschG is capable of contributing to the development or clarification of the law.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-01-26
Aktenzeichen: 5 B 29/09, 5 B 29/09 (5 C 3/10)
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Normen: § 3 Abs 1 S 1 Nr 4 EntschG, § 3 Abs 1 S 1 Nr 5 EntschG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend VG Leipzig, 27. Januar 2009, Az: 1 K 551/06, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 5. Senat
Revision; Entschädigungsrecht
1 Die Revision gegen das Urteil des Verwaltungsgerichts Leipzig vom 27. Januar 2009 ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache zuzulassen. Die Revision kann Gelegenheit geben, die Frage der Bemessungsgrundlage der Entschädigung für ein Erbbaurecht an einem sog. Trümmergrundstück zu klären und zur Auslegung des Bedeutungsgehaltes des § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 4 und Nr. 5 EntschG beitragen.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether revision should be admitted for reasons of fundamental importance
Revision is admitted because the case raises questions of fundamental importance.
The appeal can clarify the assessment basis for compensation of a hereditary building right on a so-called rubble property and contribute to the interpretation of § 3(1) sentence 1 nos. 4 and 5 EntschG.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.